A divided Supreme Court has ruled that individual judges lack the authority to grant nationwide injunctions, but the decision leaves unclear the fate of President Donald Trump’s restrictions on birthright citizenship.

WASHINGTON − An ideologically divided Supreme Court on July 14 allowed the Trump administration to fire hundreds of workers from the Education Department and continue other efforts to dismantle the agency. The court's three liberal justices opposed the order, the latest win for President Donald Trump at the high court.

In remarks before judges and lawyers in California, the justice said she believed the court had a responsibility to share its reasoning.

Experts weigh in on the Supreme Court’s emergency docket, unanimous decisions, birthright citizenship, retirements and more

The Marshall Project reports on Supreme Court rulings that weakened universal injunctions, impacting immigration laws while some criminal justice cases favored litigants.

The Supreme Court may play a key role in the ongoing Jeffrey Epstein saga, as associate Ghislaine Maxwell has appealed her conviction to the nation's highest court.

Even with new curbs on their powers, district judges have found ways to broadly halt some of the administration’s actions.

We may never see a better Supreme Court of the United States. Since Amy Coney Barrett arrived in late 2020, the six-justice conservative-ish majority has, slowly but surely, set about fixing the court’s biggest mistakes of the last century.

The top court said a nine-judge in the Indira Sawhney case (1992) allowed the executive to identify socially and educationally backward classes for reservation

By Andrew Chung (Reuters) -Even as an uproar over files relating to Jeffrey Epstein engulfs President Donald Trump and Congress, the U.S. Supreme Court is due to wade into the controversy and decide whether to hear a bid by an associate of the late financier and convicted sex offender to overturn her criminal conviction.