In this fragile moment, it is essential for Congress to reassert its authority and reign in the rogue actions of this ...

The war powers vote faces steep odds, with Republicans controlling both the House and Senate and GOP leadership backing Trump ...

President Donald Trump's decision to attack Iran has renewed a long-running debate about war powers. The Constitution gives ...

Some congressional lawmakers are still pushing for a war powers resolution that would limit President Trump's involvement in ...

In an apparent nod to Israel, some Democrats want to give Trump power to defend “an ally or partner of the United States from ...

If the War Powers Resolution is unconstitutional, it's because it gives the president too much power, not too little.

Their Trump derangement blinds them to the fact that America and the world are safer without a nuclear-capable Iran.

But as questions continue to be asked about what just transpired — and, most importantly, about the prospects of Iran developing a nuclear weapon — there’s also a more basic inquiry facing the United ...

A: No. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs changed the wording in its bylaws to comply with recent executive orders. In making the changes, words including “national origin, politics, marital ...

Article 1 of the US Constitution states that Congress has the power to declare war. But that process has not been followed formally in over 80 years, since World War II ...

Presidents must issue reports on every military action within two days — something Trump didn’t do with the Iran strike.

Trump launched an attack on Iran without a formal congressional authorization, continuing a modern presidential tradition of ignoring the delegation of powers outlined in the Constitution.